RESEARCH EVIDENCE STRONG EVIDENCE Cross-sectional study Tier 2 — Peer-reviewed study / review

Pornography Problems Due to Moral Incongruence: An Integrative Model with a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors
Grubbs, J. B., Perry, S. L., Wilt, J. A., & Reid, R. C.
Year
2019
Journal
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Type
Systematic review / meta-analysis
Source
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30076491/
Last verified
2026-10-04

Main question

How much of self-perceived "porn addiction" is explained by moral incongruence rather than use?

Summary

Grubbs, Perry, Wilt, and Reid (2019) integrated existing research and conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between moral incongruence and self-reported problems with pornography. Moral incongruence refers to the distress people feel when their behaviour conflicts with their moral or religious values.

Main finding

The authors found that moral incongruence is a major — and frequently the strongest — predictor of whether a person labels themselves as “addicted” to pornography. This label is often driven more by the moral conflict than by how much pornography the person actually views.

Why it matters

This work is central to understanding how PPU is defined and why the behavioural addiction debate is not only about brain science but also about values and self-perception. It does not, on its own, settle whether heavy use is harmful.

Findings

Limitations

Clinical relevance

Suggests clinicians should assess moral distress separately from behaviour.

Relevance to problematic pornography use

Central to understanding why people label their use as problematic.

Related topics